Legal Opinion

Newton v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 25, 2001No. CA CR 00-1057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN F. STROUD, Jr., Chief Judge.

Appellant, Roy Newton, J entered a conditional plea of guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. He was sentenced to twelve years in the Arkansas Department of Correction, followed by a six-year suspended imposition of sentence, and was assessed fines and court costs in the amount of two thousand dollars. Newton’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

When reviewing the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, the appellate courts make an independent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Gregory B. Bloomfield, Also Known as Earl Marcum JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. Muhammad v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Embry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Bell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laime v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Willoughby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. Laime v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API