Legal Opinion

Embry v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 2000No. CA CR 99-1011PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

K.MAX KOONCE, II, Judge.

Appellant entered a conditional plea of guilty to manufacturing a controlled substance pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 24.3. He was sentenced to fifteen years in the Arkansas Department of Correction. On appeal, appellant argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm.

When reviewing the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, the appellate courts make an independent determination based on the totality of the circumstances and reverse only if the trial court’s ruling was clearly against the preponderance of the evidence.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mancusi v. DeForteSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. James S. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wigley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Yancey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API