Legal Opinion
Laime v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided December 6, 2001No. CR 01-559Published
1Opinion of the Court
60 S.W.3d 464 (2001)
347 Ark. 142
David LAIME and Jeanna Dodd
v.
STATE of Arkansas.
No. CR 01-559.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
December 6, 2001.
Wilson & Associates, P.L.L.C., by: Patrick J. Benca, Little Rock, for appellant David Laime.
Jeff Rosenzweig, Little Rock, for appellant Jeanna Dodd.
Mark Pryor, Att'y Gen., by: Misty Wilson Borkowski, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.
ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice.
The appellants in this case, David Laime and Jeanna Dodd, appeal from an order denying their motion to suppress drug evidence and statements. They raise seven points on appeal: (1) the state…
Also in this document: Dissent · Thorton; Dissent · Hannah.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.