Legal Opinion

Sonkin & Melena Co., L.P.A. v. Zaransky

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1992No. 61057PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harper, Judge.

I

Appellant, Stephen Zaransky, appeals from the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, raising three assignments of error challenging the trial court’s award of damages.

Sonkin & Melena Co., L.P.A. “(Sonkin & Melena”) cross-appeals from the same judgment, also raising three assignments of error challenging the trial court’s failure to award compensatory and punitive damages.

We affirm Zaransky’s appeal in part and reverse in part, and affirm Sonkin & Melena’s cross-appeal.

II

Sonkin & Melena is a legal professional corporation with its office in the city of Cleveland,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Juhasz v. Quik Shops, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. City of Gahanna v. Eastgate Properties, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fox & Assocs. Co. v. PurdonOhio Supreme Court · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hoyt, Inc. v. Gordon & Associates, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Glasstech, Inc. v. TGL Tempering Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
  3. Campanella v. Commerce Exchange BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Matter of CupplesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Widok v. Estate of WolfOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API