Legal Opinion

City of Gahanna v. Eastgate Properties, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1988No. 87-563PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHildebrandt, J.

Eastgate initially challenges the appellate court’s reversal of the award of attorney fees. Generally, a prevailing party may not recover attorney fees as costs of litigation in the absence of statutory authority unless the breaching party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, obdurately or for oppressive reasons. Sorin v. Bd. of Edn. (1976), 46 Ohio St. 2d 177, 75 O.O. 2d 224, 347 N.E. 2d 527. This is commonly known as the “American rule.” However, Eastgate maintains that it is entitled to an award of attorney fees, as damages in defending against Gahanna’s forcible entry and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Charles R. Combs Trucking, Inc. v. International Harvester Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Digital & Analog Design Corp. v. North Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. AGF, Inc. v. Great Lakes Heat Treating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bobb Forest Products, Inc. v. Morbark Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Volunteer Energy Services, Inc. v. Option Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. Rhodes v. Rhodes Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API