Legal Opinion

Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Atmore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOB, J.

The defendant admits in his answer the execution and endorsement by him of each of the notes sued on in this action.

He alleges that he executed and endorsed the note for $5,000, for the accommodation of the First National Bank of New Bern, N. C., and that he received no value for said note from said bank. C. S., 3009. It is alleged in the complaint that this note was negotiated by the First National Bank of New Bern, N. C., to the plaintiff.

The defendant admits in his answer, that he received value for the note for $2,000, from the payee, the First National Bank of New Bern, N. C. He alleges,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tar Heel Hosiery Mill v. Durham Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. William Whitman, Inc. v. YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herndon v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Brown v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Parrish v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API