Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawexx, J.

Tbe plaintiff contends tbat it would be improper for tbe court to consider tbe relevancy of bis allegations on the defendant’s motion to strike, but tbat this can and should be postponed until plaintiff introduces evidence and defendant objects thereto. This position questions tbe propriety of tbe Court’s considering tbe merits of defendant’s appeal, which is to challenge the timeliness and propriety of tbe appeal itself. Certainly, if tbe appeal is not premature or unavailable, it must be decided here on its merits.

At tbe threshold of investigation we are met by C. S., 638, which sets forth…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  3. Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. South v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Shaw v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Privette v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. United States v. FolkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API