Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Johnson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1888No. 13,123PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Starke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

In this case, all the appellants jointly, and appellant Mary M. Thomas separately, who were all defendants below, assigned here as the only error for which they ask the reversal of the judgment herein, that appellee’s complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

In his complaint, appellee, Johnson, alleged that, on the 13th day of September, 1883, he recovered judgment against defendant John A. Taylor, in the Pulaski Circuit Court, for the sum of $3,000, in an action against said John A. Taylor for damages for an assault and battery by him committed on the person…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Donellan v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Becknell v. BecknellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Kinney v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Smith v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Lassiter v. JackmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. McCormickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Petree v. BrothertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Brumbaugh v. RichcreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API