Legal Opinion

Brumbaugh v. Richcreek

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1891No. 14,777PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Prom the Kosciusko Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.

This was a suit by Rachel Richcreek, the appellee, to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance of land.

The appellee was a judgment-creditor of Susan Brumbaugh, who had conveyed certain lands to appellant, and appellee insisted that the conveyances were made by said Susan and received by appellant for the sole purpose of preventing the collection of her claim.

The complaint is in two paragraphs, and the circuit court overruled a separate demurrer to each paragraph. Appellant excepted, and this ruling is assigned as error.

In the first paragraph of the complaint it is alleged, in substance,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Adams v. SlateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. McCole v. LoehrIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Sherman v. HoglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Taylor v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Goodwine v. CadwalladerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Wyatt v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Petree v. BrothertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. State ex rel. Little v. ParsonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hoesman v. ShefflerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API