Legal Opinion
O'Neill v. City of Shoreline
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 18, 2014No. 70657-8-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.
¶1 The city of Shoreline and Deputy Mayor Maggie Fimia (collectively City) appeal a trial court decision awarding costs and attorney fees to Beth and Doug O’Neill under the Public Records Act.1 The City claims that *18the O’Neills lost their right to this recovery because they filed their fee request more than 10 days after the court entered a stipulated judgment on their damage claim. Because the City fails to show prejudice from the O’Neills’ failure to file their fee request within the time required by CR 54(d)(2), we affirm.
FACTS
¶2 In 2006, the O’Neills sued the City, alleging violations of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- Streater v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Hume v. American Disposal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Clipse v. Commercial Driver Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Cedar Grove Composting, Inc. v. City of MarysvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Arthur West v. Seattle Port CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Michael Weaver v. City Of EverettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.