Legal Opinion

Nethery v. Olson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1952No. 32022PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action to obtain a declaration of forfeiture of a certain real-estate contract and a decree quieting title in them to the real property described therein against any claim of the defendants. After the defendants’ demurrers were overruled, they answered separately, denying certain allegations of the complaint and affirmatively setting up the defenses of the statute of limitations and laches. Defendants’ answers also contained a cross-complaint alleging adverse possession of the property for thirty-two years and praying that title be quieted in them. The affirmative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Lopeman v. GeeWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Slocum v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. First National Bank of Seattle v. MapsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. In Re Estate of BoundyWashington Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Wickwire v. McFaddenAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Popovich v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. MolitorWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Paulson v. HigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API