Legal Opinion
Lydall, Inc. v. Ruschmeyer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 24, 2007No. SC 17612PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The defendant, Walter A. Ruschmeyer, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court, following a bench trial, enjoining him from disclosing or using information deemed by the trial court to be a trade secret and awarding compensatory and punitive damages and attorney’s fees to the plaintiff, Lydall, Inc. (Lydall). The trial court concluded that Ruschmeyer had breached employment agreements with Lydall and had violated the Connecticut Uniform Trade Secrets Act (CUTSA), General Statutes § 35-50 et seq., and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Omnitech International, Inc. v. Clorox Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- De La Concha of Hartford, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Triangle Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bhatia v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Monti v. WenkertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Department of Transportation v. White Oak Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.