People v. Olea
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARRILLI, J.
When a defendant agrees to a plea bargain by which he pleads guilty to an offense not specifically included in the sex offender registration statute, and the registration requirement is not included in the bargain, may the sentencing court subsequently require the defendant to register based on the facts underlying the offense? Not without violating the plea agreement.
Armando Olea appeals from a judgment and sentence entered on his plea of guilty to burglary charges. He contends the sentencing court violated the plea bargain he had accepted when it ordered him to register…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. PicklesimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- State v. WhalenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. LetteerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.