Legal Opinion
Hart v. Kennedy
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 1969No. 69-238 CivPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate Order of Dismissal filed herein, the Court finds the same to be without merit and should be denied.
The District Judge with whom a case is filed has the responsibility to determine whether jurisdiction exists. Lion Mfg. Corporation v. Kennedy, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 367, 330 F.2d 833 (1964). Jurisdiction is lacking if a plaintiff has no standing to sue. American Commuters Assn. v. Levitt, 279 F.Supp. 40 (S.D.N.Y.1967). The provision requiring the presence of a court of three judges necessarily assumes that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Utica Mutual Insurance Company v. Merle D. Vincent, Jr., Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Lion Manufacturing Corporation (New Lion) v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Miller v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sharrow v. PeyserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Shapiro v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- Pettit v. New MexicoDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2004