Legal Opinion

Miller v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1965No. Civ. A. 36820PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

I am in receipt of a request from a United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the designation of two other judges to constitute, with him, a district court of three judges pursuant to Sections 2281 and 2284, Title 28, U.S.C., to hear and determine this case, which is alleged to involve the constitutional validity of 75 P.S. §§ 1413 and 1414, Article XIV, the “Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Provisions of the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code”, which are asserted to be in conflict with Section 17 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 35. A brief…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Levering & Garrigues Co. v. MorrinSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Hannis Distilling Co. v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Turner v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Clarence Jackson v. Hon. Emett C. Choate, U.S. District Judge, Southern District of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Maryland Citizens for a Representative General Assembly v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  3. Florencio Merced Rosa, Etc. v. Blas C. Herrero, Jr., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Nicholas D'andrea, Jack Ware and Nelson HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Majuri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API