Legal Opinion
Pettit v. New Mexico
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided December 7, 2004No. CIV. 04-1063 JB/RHSPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs Verified Request for Three-Judge Panel, filed September 20, 2004 (Doc. 5). The primary issue is whether the Court should appoint three judges to hear this case. Because Plaintiff Michael Jude Pettit does not explain either in his Complaint or in this Request why, under the judicial scheme that Congress has established, a three-judge panel should hear his case, the Court will deny the motion and proceed to decide the issues that the Plaintiffs case raises.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Pettit files…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. American Library Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.