Legal Opinion

Beauchamp v. Oklahoma City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 1970No. 44475PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Chief Justice.

This is an original action filed in this Court on September 17, 1970, in which the plaintiff contends that the portion of Art. 10, § 27, of the Oklahoma Constitution, requiring persons voting at the election therein provided, to be “qualified property tax paying voters,” violates the equal protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

We accept original jurisdiction of the action because of the public importance of the matter and the need for an early determination of the involved question.

There appears to be no dispute as to the facts.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Henry v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  5. Settle v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Quinn v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Arthur v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  3. Fent v. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Dean v. Wes Watkins Area Vocational-Technical School District, No. 25Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Martin v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API