Settle v. City of Muskogee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
This is an original action in this court in which we are called on to determine the validity of Art. 10, § 27, of the Oklahoma Constitution. Plaintiff contends Art. 10, § 27, is unconstitutional on the ground that the limitation therein, requiring persons voting at the election therein to be “qualified property tax paying voters,” violates the equal protection clause in the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
We accept original jurisdiction of the action because of the public importance of the matter and the need for an early determination of the involved…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Avery v. Midland CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stewart v. Parish School Board of the Parish of St. CharlesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
- Pike v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 11 IN EL PASO COUNTYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Beauchamp v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Elk City v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Settle v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF COUNTY OF MUSKOGEESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.