Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2000No. 97-215PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice, Retired.

Following a bench trial, appellant was found guilty of possession of a deadly weapon with intent to unlawfully threaten the life or physical well-being of another in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-8-108 (Lexis 1999). Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the charging information, the constitutionality of the warrantless seizure of firearms and ammunition from his home/business, and the sufficiency of the evidence pointing to intent at trial, We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. ISSUES

Appellant, John A. Taylor (Taylor), presents four issues which, in essence,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. United States v. Thekkedajh Peethamb MenonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. KylesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Giles v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Vassar v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Joyner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Martin Alan Ridinger v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API