Legal Opinion

F.N. Wolf & Co. v. Brothers

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*99OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

This motion raises the issue of whether an amendment to the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) Code of Arbitration Procedure, effectively barring waivers of the right to arbitrate, such as are involved herein, has retroactive effect. Two Justices of this court have arrived at conflicting results: Wolf & Co. v Egan (NYLJ, Feb. 15, 1994, at 24, col 6 [Solomon, J.], finding the clause had retroactive effect), and Wolf & Co. v Carter (NYLJ, Feb. 15, 1994, at 24, col 2 [Shainswit, J.], finding the clause had no retroactive effect).

The undersigned…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Gangel v. DeGrootNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Roman Catholic Diocese v. New York State Department of HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas James Associates, Inc. Barbara S. Miller Michelle K. Reichert Dave Kleber Michael G. Gomez and James A. Villa v. Harry JamesonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Johnson v. Piper Jaffray, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Wojcik v. Aetna Life Insurance & Annuity Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  5. Nielsen v. GreenwoodDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API