Legal Opinion
Gangel v. DeGroot
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 15, 1977PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Order affirmed, with costs.
Special Term correctly held that a contractual choice of forum, whether as to place or the preclusion of the right to litigate in favor of arbitration, must be express (see Matter of Rosenbaum [American Sur. Co.], 11 NY2d 310, 314; Matter of Riverdale Fabrics Corp. [Tillinghast-Stiles Co.], 306 NY 288, 289-292; cf. Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 298-301, app dsmd 282 US 808; Matter of Doughboy Inds. [Pantasote Co], 17 AD2d 216, 220). The clause in the marine insurance policy in suit, as opposed to the "broad” arbitration clause…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Lentine v. FundaroNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- In Re Arbitration Between Rosenbaum & American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Bowmer v. BowmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fleishman v. LillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.