Legal Opinion

Briggs v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1987No. S-1243PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

The primary issue here is whether breathalyzer test results suppressed on due process grounds in a criminal prosecution were improperly admitted in a subsequent license revocation hearing.

I. BACKGROUND.

Leonard P. Briggs was stopped and arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI). At the Kodiak police station, he was given a breathalyzer test using an Intoximeter 3000, which produced a printout showing a blood-alcohol content of Q.129%. 1 No breath sample was preserved, nor was Briggs given a blood test to independently verify the breathalyzer test results.

Brig…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., Lummus Company v. Honorable Archie O. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. United States of America Ex Rel. Leo Anthony Digiangiemo v. Paul J. Regan, Commissioner, New York State Division of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Municipality of Anchorage v. SerranoCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Thorne v. Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Borg-Warner Corp. v. Avco Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Larson v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Pruitt v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API