Legal Opinion
United States v. Eteuati Paopao
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 22, 2006No. 05-10653PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING AND AMENDED OPINION
TRAGER, District Judge.
ORDER
This court’s opinion filed October 10, 2006, and published at United States v. Paopao, 465 F.3d 404 (9th Cir. October 10, 2006) is amended as follows:
On slip op. page 17359, and appearing at 465 F.3d at 409, insert the following footnote after the final paragraph in Part I:
Of course, Paopao had a Fourth Amendment privacy interest in his effects and, therefore, had standing to contest the seizure of his tan bag. However, he did not claim, nor could he reasonably, that the seizure of the weapon and the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. Berber-TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Dante SheffieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Reyes-BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Courtney NobleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.