Legal Opinion

Chaney v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 1995No. Record 941562PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal, we consider whether the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court’s ruling that a prescriptive easement had been established. The dispositive issue is whether the plaintiffs proved an adverse use.

The property involved in this dispute is located in King and Queen County. In 1944, J.M. Garnett purchased a five-acre tract which he later subdivided. By deed, the Garnetts granted each lot purchaser

the right to use the strip of land 10-ft. wide over and along the northern boundary of this lot and over and along the northern boundary of all other lots in the Re-Subdivision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pettus v. KeelingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Surf Realty Corp. v. StandingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Davis v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1924
  4. Ward v. HarperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  5. McNeil v. KingreySupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Quatannens v. TyrrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Martin v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Hollander v. World Mission Church of Washington, D.C.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  4. Nelson v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  5. Amstutz v. Everett Jones Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API