Legal Opinion

Quatannens v. Tyrrell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 17, 2004No. Record 032562PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY Justice DONALD W. LEMONS.

In this appeal, we consider the evidentiary requirement to sustain a claim of adverse possession in a dispute over a narrow strip of land between adjoining landowners.

I. Facts and Proceedings Below

Stephen D. Quatannens and Eileen A. Quatannens ("the Quatannens") reside at 217 S. Alfred Street in Alexandria, Virginia. Robert E. Tyrrell, Jr. and his wife, Jeanne M. Hauch, ("the Tyrrells") reside at 219 S. Alfred Street, Alexandria, Virginia. In dispute is the ownership of a strip of land 100 feet long and ranging from approximately eight to 20 inches wide,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Carmody v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  2. Grappo v. BlanksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  3. Christian v. BulbeckSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  4. Chaney v. HaynesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  5. Haney v. BreedenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  2. Muhammad v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Helms v. ManspileSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  4. Estate of Parfitt v. ParfittSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  5. Scott v. BURWELL'S BAY IMP. ASS'NSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API