Black v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs, acting under a contract with defendant City of Santa Monica, were engaged in making alterations in the municipality’s street lighting system. By its terms the contract provided that- the city should be the sole judge as to the satisfaction and performance of the work done by the contractors and that it might at any time “upon ninety days’ written previous notice’’ cancel and terminate said contract.
The within action is a proceeding in mandamus against the city and its officers, alleging that the contract was canceled by defendants without any notice whatsoever,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oldfield v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Perrin v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Cline v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Wenzler v. Municipal Court for the Pasadena Judicial DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Elwin K. Shain v. Washington National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Board of Education of the Scottsdale High School District No. 212 v. Scottsdale Education Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Petroleum Carriers Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.