Legal Opinion
Matrix Group Ltd. v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 20, 2007No. 05-4345, 06-1033PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
After Rawlings Sporting Goods Company terminated an. agreement granting an exclusive license to Matrix Group Limited to sell its sports bags, the parties sued each other for breach of contract. Matrix also asserted claims against Rawlings and K2, Inc., Rawlings’ parent corporation, under a Florida statute on deceptive trade practices and a tortious interference claim against K2. The district court 1 granted summary judgment to Matrix on the contract, and a jury returned verdicts in favor of Matrix against Rawlings and K2. Post trial motions were denied, except for…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Robert L. Moore and Jeannette S. Parry v. Painewebber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown ManorSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matrix Group Limited, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company K2, Inc., Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees. Matrix Group Limited, Inc., a Florida Corporation With a Principal Place of Business in Safety Harbor, County of Pinellas, State of Florida, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation With a Principal Place of Business in Fenton, County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Gecker v. Flynn (In re Emerald Casino, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Todman v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013