Legal Opinion

Morales v. Sociedad Española De Auxilio Mutuo Y Beneficencia

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 18, 2008No. 07-1951PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to determine for the first time what it means to “come[ ] to” a hospital’s emergency department within the purview of the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTA-LA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd. After carefully considering the language of EMTALA, the regulation addressing the pertinent statutory text, and the policies that underlie the statute, we hold that an individual can come to the emergency department for EMTALA purposes without physically arriving on the hospital’s grounds as long as the individual is en route to the hospital…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tasker v. DHL Retirement Savings PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  2. Neang Chea Taing v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Alvarez-Torres v. Ryder Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Texaco Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API