Legal Opinion
Tasker v. DHL Retirement Savings Plan
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 6, 2010No. 09-2661PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises an issue of first impression at the federal appellate level concerning the workings of the anti-cutback rule of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1054(g), when viewed through the prism of a Treasury Department regulation, 26 C.F.R. § 1.411(d) — 4. The issue arises in the context of plaintiff-appellant Jeffrey R. Tasker’s claim that a group of related entities' — DHL Retirement Savings Plan, DHL Retirement Pension Plan, Employee Benefits Committee of DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc., and the DHL Retirement Pension Plan Committee…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. TamboneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Centro Medico Del Turabo, Inc. v. Feliciano De MelecioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Ahern v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Culhane v. Aurora Loan Services of NebrasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Harron v. Town of FranklinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Mead v. Independence AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.