Ardison v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
IVERS, Judge:
Albert L. Ardison appeals a June 24, 1992, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which denied an increased rating for service-connected tinea pedis (athlete’s foot) (now rated 10% disabling). Albert L. Ardison, BVA 92-15455 (June 24, 1992). On June 21, 1993, the Secretary filed a mo*406tion to vacate the BVA decision and for summary remand. On July 19, 1993, appellant filed a reply in opposition to the Secretary’s motion. The Court has jurisdiction over the ease pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). Because of the issues presented by this ease, the Court holds that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Schafrath v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Stegall v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- James P. Barr v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Kay v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Brian J. Hart v. Gordon H. MansfieldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Barney J. Stefl v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.