Sisk v. Caswell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County, and from an order denying a new trial. L. W. Fulkerth, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This controversy arises over an alleged claim of right by plaintiff to the use, for the purpose of irrigation, of water carried through a certain irrigating ditch running through and upon the land of the defendant. The purpose of the suit is to quiet plaintiff’s title to and interest in said ‘ditch, to enjoin defendant from interfering with or obstructing the exercise of his right to use the same, and for damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff for defendant’s wrongful obstruction thereof.
The plaintiff obtained judgment as prayed for, and from said judgment and the order denying…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kutz v. McCuneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Memmert v. McKeenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Burk v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Patterson v. ArthursSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Evans v. FaughtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- McCarty v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bozdech v. Montana Ranches Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
- Kantlehner v. BiscegliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.