Legal Opinion

Roush v. Heffelbower

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1923No. Docket No. 9PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries received while assisting in the operation of a corn husker belonging to the defendant. Both of the parties are farmers living in the same neighborhood near Freeport in Barry county, Michigan. The plaintiff did not own the farm upon which he was living at the time of the accident, but was engaged in working it on shares. The defendant .owned a large farm and frequently exchanged work with the plaintiff and sometimes employed him at regular wages. In the fall of 1920, the defendant was the owner of a corn husker which he used on his own…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shafer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. In re BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Sylcord v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Bykle v. District Court of Watonwan CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Claim of Vincent v. Taylor Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alexander v. JE Hixson & Sons Funeral HomeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Mundell v. SwedlundIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stanton v. Lloyd Hammond Produce FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Benson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Baldwin, State Treasurer v. RobyWyoming Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API