Legal Opinion
Capital Network System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 28, 1994No. 92-1640PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge MIKVA.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
MIKVA, Chief Judge:
Capital Network System, Inc. (“Capital”) filed an Interstate Common Carrier Transfer Service tariff with the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) to recover the costs of rerouting long-distance calls that parties charged to “proprietary” calling cards. The Commission rejected Capital’s proposed tariff without a hearing, deeming the tariff patently unreasonable in violation of the Communications Act and unclear and ambiguous in violation of Commission…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Paralyzed Veterans of America, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. D.C. Arena L.P., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Bush-Quayle '92 Primary Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. James T. DickersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- City of Arlington v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Alliance for Community Media v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.