Legal Opinion

Arrant v. Zambrano

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 1, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01220Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN RAY ARRANT Case No.: 3:20-cv-01220-JLS-AGS CDCR No. K98602, 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, 13 RECONSIDERATION vs. 14 M. ZAMBRANO, et al., 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 14) 16 17 18 19 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Melvin Ray Arrant’s Second Motion for 20 Reconsideration, in which he asks the Court to reconsider its December 11, 2020 Order 21 dismissing his case. (“2d Mot. Recon.,” ECF No. 14.) On June 29, 2020, Plaintiff filed 22 this civil action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(“Compl.”),…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Ybarra v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
Zimmerman v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
Murray W. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Cross-Appellants, and Sam Steiger, Deponent, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. Henman R.J. Barncastle Willis Gibson Richard A. Stacy Leland Pico Dale BerndtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
Stevo Design, Inc. v. SBR Marketing Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.