Legal Opinion

Schweiner v. Kralovetz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The first contention of defendant is that the evidence does not sustain the jury’s conclusion that Frank Kralovetz, the defendant, was guilty of conduct which was the controlling cause of the alienation of the affections of plaintiff’s wife. This requires a consideration of the facts.

At the time of the trial plaintiff was fifty-five years of age and his wife fifty years of age. The parties were married in February, 1902. Seven children were born of this marriage. Two of the children, both sons, lived at home, one of them twenty-one years of age and the other thirteen. The parties lived on a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNamara v. McNamaraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Lehner v. KelleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quick v. American Legion 1960 Convention Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Grammoll v. LastWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Alaimo v. SchwanzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API