Alaimo v. Schwanz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
On appeal the defendant in this action for alienation of affections argues that (1) the evidence does not support the verdict; and (2) the damages are excessive.
Sufficiency of evidence.
The elements which must be proved in a cause of action for alienation of affections are: (1) Wrongful conduct by the defendant; (2) plaintiff’s loss of affection or consortium of the other spouse; and (3) a causal connection between the defendant’s conduct and the plaintiff’s loss.
The challenge here to the sufficiency of the evidence targets the finding of plaintiff’s loss of affection. Appellant contends that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- King v. SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- State ex rel. Ernest Fleckenstein Brewing Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Paulson v. ScottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
- Maahs v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Roach v. KeaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Gorder v. SimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Bowen v. Bullis (In Re Bullis)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- Gorder v. SimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Northridge Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.