Legal Opinion
Malone v. Carey
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1936No. Civ. 9953PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action for damages for false imprisonment. Defendants are officers of the town of Emeryville and their official bondsmen, to wit, J. L. Kennon, city judge; E. J. Carey, chief of police; J. J. Carey, assistant chief; Paul Lees, city clerk; and A. Sargent, police officer. The second amended complaint alleges in substance that the defendant E. J. Carey, while acting in his official capacity as chief of police, through the agency of J. J. Carey, his assistant, swore to a complaint against plaintiff for the violation of a traffic ordinance of Emeryville; that defendant J. L. Kennon, city judge,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Going v. DinwiddieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Donati v. RighettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Pankewicz v. JessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Kalish v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Platz v. MarionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. WeitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Barrier v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Perry v. MeikleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Herndon v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Milliken v. City of South PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.