Legal Opinion

Carta v. Dale

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

Movant, Alan M. Carta, the owner and operator of a motor vehicle which collided with a vehicle operated by respondent, Theta M. Dale, was sued by Mrs. Dale for bodily injuries, pain and suffering, medical expenses, and lost wages. Neither of the parties had rejected the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act, and each of them was insured by the same insurer, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

As the insurer of Mrs. Dale, State Farm Mutual paid basic reparations benefits to her for medical expenses and lost wages. At the trial of her lawsuit against Carta, State Farm Mutual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KiddKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Dudas v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wemyss v. ColemanKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. RuschellKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Krahwinkel v. Commonwealth Aluminum Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Bohl v. Consolidated Freightways Corp. of DelawareCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  5. City of Louisville v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API