Legal Opinion
Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. Ruschell
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1992No. 91-SC-494-DGPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBSON, Justice.
This is an action filed by Paula L. Rusc-hell, the insured, seeking a declaratory judgment and damages against her insurer, Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, for no-fault benefits. The benefits are described in her policy as “Personal Injury Protection (PIP)” coverage, and conform to the statutory coverage described in the Motor Vehicle Reparations Act (MVRA) as “Basic Reparations Benefits” (BRB).
Ms. Ruschell was injured in an automobile accident August 26, 1986. On August 5, 1987, she filed a negligence action against the alleged tortfeasor and his employer, who were insured…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cingoranelli v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. IvieUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Crime Fighters Patrol v. HilesKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Richardson v. Eastland, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KiddKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- O'BRYAN v. HedgespethKentucky Supreme Court · 1995
- Leo v. HillmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Schwartz v. HastyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. SamplesKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Stevenson ex rel. Stevenson v. Anthem Casualty Insurance GroupKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.