Legal Opinion

Dudas v. Kaczmarek

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 20, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILHOIT, Judge.

The sole question presented in this appeal is whether an injured party in a vehicular accident may recover in his negligence action against an alleged tortfeasor amounts which he has received, or is entitled to receive, from an insurance company as basic reparation benefits [BRB] under the Kentucky Motor Vehicle Reparations Act, KRS 304.39-010 to -340. We hold that when this is properly objected to, he may not.

The appellant, John Dudas, was found by a jury of the Jefferson Circuit Court to have been the driver of a vehicle in which the appellee, Richard Kaczmarek, was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fann v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  2. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KiddKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hargett v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  4. D & B Coal Co. v. FarmerKentucky Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miller v. SwiftKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Carta v. DaleKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Speck v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1995
  4. Slone v. CaudillCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  5. Henson v. FletcherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API