Legal Opinion

Dangberg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1977No. 40946PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

In this action to recover damages for slander and false imprisonment, the trial court sustained a demurrer and dismissed plaintiff’s last amended petition.

The only issue involved in this appeal is whether plaintiff’s amended petition states a cause of action. We affirm.

Plaintiff originally commenced this action against Sears, Roebuck and Company and J. L. Brandéis & Sons, Inc. After demurrers were sustained to the original petition and an amended petition, plaintiff was given leave to docket the cases separately against Sears and Brandéis. This appeal is from the dismissal of plaintiff’s last…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hall v. RiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Schmidt v. Richman Gordman, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Edgar v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Johnson v. RuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Buhrman v. International Harvester CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Holmes v. Crossroads Joint VentureNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Turner v. WelliverNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. White v. Ardan, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dixon v. Reconciliation, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API