Clark & Enersen, Hamersky, Schlaebitz, Burroughs & Thomsen, Inc. v. Schimmel Hotels Corp.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.
Plaintiff’s petition seeks to recover for preliminary architectural and engineering services performed in connection with a contemplated 100-unit motor hotel addition to a hotel on which construction was never begun. The amended petition proceeded on two counts. Both counts seek to recover for the same ’ work and both’ pray for recovery of an identical amount. The second count is on a quantum meruit theory of recovery. Defendants’ demurrer to that count has been overruled and the case must still be tried on that count. Defendants’ demurrer to the first count of plaintiff’s amended petition…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Furstenberg v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
- State, Board of Educational Lands & Funds v. BardsleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
- Johnson v. RuhlNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Warren v. KlemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by14 opinions
- Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Shelton v. Board of RegentsNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- County of Lancaster v. County of CusterNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- Fisher v. Housing Auth. of City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- Professional Recruiters, Inc. v. OliverNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.