Legal Opinion

Schuyler State Bank v. Cech

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1988No. 86-508PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

In the “Second Cause of Action” of its petition, Schuyler State Bank alleged that Schuyler Farm Supply, Inc. (Farm Supply), gave the bank five promissory notes in the aggregate principal of $1,228,531 and that, after credit for payments, principal of $1,130,318 was unpaid on Farm Supply’s notes. The bank also alleged other advances of $167,993 to Farm Supply, none of which had been repaid. The total principal of Farm Supply’s indebtedness was $1,298,311. Theofil J. Cech had given his unconditional guaranties for Farm Supply’s debts to the bank. On the basis of those guaranties, the bank…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gold-Mining Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Davis v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. McWhirterSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Daggett v. KeshnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Ambroz v. Cornhusker Square Ltd.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hecker v. Ravenna BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Chapman v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Balfany v. BalfanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dammann v. LittyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API