In the Matter of Fenwick
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
Two questions are presented by this record: (1) "Was the sentence entered by the trial court to six months imprisonment in the Ohio Reformatory for Women at Marysville, Ohio, and payment of a $200 fine and the costs of prosecution, and a further commitment for failure to pay such fine and cost, contrary to law? (2) Is the law constitutional under which the sentence was imposed; namely, .the law providing for the Ohio Reformatory for Women?
As to the legality of the sentence imposed, it is to be noted that the section under which the same was given is as follows:
Section 2148-7, General Code:
“Aft…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jones v. McClaughrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Yutze v. CopelanOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- State v. HuberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Robinson v. YorkDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- State v. HolcombOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- City of Columbus v. RowlandOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- In Re BradyOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Beatty v. AlstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.