Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Wilderness Medical Society Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 10, 2021No. 2:17-cv-02471Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARTIN HOFFMAN, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:17-cv-02471-TLN-JDP 13 14 v. ORDER WILDERNESS MEDICAL SOCIETY, 15 Defendant, 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Wilderness Medical Society’s (“Defendant”) 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff Martin Hoffman (“Plaintiff”) filed a 20 response. (ECF No. 25.) Defendant replied. (ECF No. 28.) For the reasons set forth below, the 21 Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part as moot Defendant’s motion. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.