Legal Opinion

Williams v. Nelson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1925No. 4245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff commenced this proceeding in the district court of Salt Lake county, pursuant to the provisions of Comp. Laws Utah 1917, §§ 7313 to 7327, inclusive, commonly known as the forcible entry and detainer statute. The complaint, conforms to the requirements of that statute, which relates to the recovery of the possession of real estate where a tenant unlawfully holds possession after the expiration of his term, or where the tenancy has been terminated for failure to pay rent.

Plaintiff, in his complaint, after describing the premises in question, in substance alleged that the defendant…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Whiting v. . EdmundsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Tewksbury v. MagraffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Franklin v. MeridaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Jones v. . ReillyNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. The People Ex Rel. Ainslee v. . HowlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. P.H. Investment v. OliverUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Dunbar v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Richardson v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lincoln Financial Corp. v. FerrierUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lincoln Financial Corp. v. FerrierUtah Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API