Legal Opinion

Mengel v. Mengel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 18, 1912PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Scott District Court. — IIon. A. J. House, J udge. From an additional allowance to plaintiff of temporary alimony or suit money in a suit for divorce under the title above given, defendant. 'appeals.- —

1Opinion of the Court

Deembr, J.-

— -This case has had a checkered career, and the record now before us is incomplete and difficult to understand. Wé are advised that there is now before us another, intermediate order in an original divorce case brought by plaintiff against her husband, George Mengel, which latter case has not as yet been tried, although it has been pending for many years, during which time there has been a prolonged controversy over many intermediate or collateral orders. One branch of the case reached us many years ago and was disposed of, so far as this court is concerned, by an opinion which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Beadleston v. . BeadlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. McCarthy v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Shors v. ShorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Jenkins v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Bohnert v. BohnertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Andreesen v. AndreesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. Ex Parte AppersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Scheffers v. ScheffersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Hopkins v. HopkinsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
  5. Gomes v. GomesHawaii Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API