Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Apperson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 12, 1928No. 6 Div. 906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The petition for mandamus is to the judge of the circuit court. Its purpose is to review a decree ■ overruling motion to confirm the register’s report allowing temporary alimony and attorney’s fees.

The submission on December 4th was upon the motion of petitioner of date of November 8-, 1926, to' confirm the report of the register, to which no exceptions had been reserved. The answer of the judge shows that there was a submission for final decree on the merits on November 10th, and at the time the report of the register, without exception, was before the court unconfirmed.' The decree…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  3. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Jeter v. JeterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  5. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Lyall v. LyallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Taylor v. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  5. Ex Parte WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API