Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Hopkins

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 5, 1953No. 301PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, J.:

The plaintiff brought this action for divorce upon the ground of adultery. Prior to the commencement of the action, the plaintiff employed private detectives to procure evidence of her husband’s infidelity. The services of the detectives were completely performed before the divorce action was brought and the plaintiff has paid approximately $1,100 for the services thus rendered. The plaintiff obtained the funds for that expenditure by making a loan upon her own credit.

The plaintiff now seeks an allowance of suit money, under Code 1935, § 3508, sufficient to include reimbursement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beadleston v. . BeadlestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Loveren v. LoverenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Mengel v. MengelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rubin v. RubinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. A. I. D. v. P. M. D.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  3. Husband B. v. Wife B.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  4. Wife R. v. Husband R.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. Fulling v. FullingSuperior Court of Delaware · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API