Legal Opinion
Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 23, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3416PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Judge.
Appellees Paul M. Flory and Vera Flory, husband and wife, commenced an action for breach of warranty, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and fraud, arising out of their purchase of a mobile home. Defendants were the manufacturer, Silvercrest Industries, Inc., and its bonding company, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, and the retailer, Char-Nanza, Inc., doing business as Alamo Mobile Homes. During trial to a jury the court directed verdicts in favor of the defendants on the claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and in favor of Silvercrest…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Bouldin v. TurekArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Reader v. General Motors CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Flory v. Silvercrest Industries, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Cook v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Bowdoin v. Showell Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Seekings v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.